Wednesday, 24 January 2007

love or lust

my good fren, @ndi, confuses me...

he commented i am writing rubbish on my blog.. but then, this is MY blog.. and he refused to post comments... *roll eyes*

anyway, he said.. which is more important: love or lust?
i told him, love cos love lasts (which he rebutted, if love lasts, why are there so many break-ups?... then ms smarty-ass here thinks it's cos those aren't real love... and every love is bound by circumstances, situations...)

anyway, he said love is for ugly people.. they need to love then will get sex. haha! really meh!
so it means the ugly are loving their partners just for IT?

and with that, which is better? love sex or lust sex?
to men, i am sure, there is no difference... sex sex sex... regardless of the nature, the emotions behind it... just give them SEX!

but i'd say, lust sex makes things so much fun! i am imagining being pushed against the wall (ala Unfaithful or Mr and Mrs Smith)... and some role-playing.. basically spontaneous, hot sex.

if love sex, imagine The Notebook... and all other romantic, slow-mo make out scenes... shld be less strenuous, but still hot, with all the emotion heating the couple up... hmmmm... *dreamy*

waddya think?

No comments: